Home > Campaign finance reform, E.J. Dionne, Supreme Court > E.J. Dionne hates it when the shoe is on the other foot

E.J. Dionne hates it when the shoe is on the other foot

Boy, leftist totalitarians like E.J. Dionne sure do hate it when the shoe is on the other foot, don’t they?

The Supreme Court’s 5-to-4 decision last week giving American corporations the right to unlimited political spending was an astonishing display of judicial arrogance, overreach and unjustified activism.

Turning its back on a century of practice and decades of precedent, a narrow right-wing majority on the court decided to change the American political system by tilting it decisively in favor of corporate interests.

The right could say the same about hundreds of Supreme Court decisions — a few of which this latest decision reversed. It’s not judicial activism to return rights clearly spelled out in the Constitution to those from whom they were stripped by leftist tinkerers (both in Congress and on a truly activist court) who over the years haven’t wanted their power taken from them by those who could fund strong campaigns against them.

Besides, there are some virtues and values we must hold to, whether doing so sends our country straight to hell (or the bottom of the nation-state food chain) or not. One of them is that any and everyone who wants to and has the means should be able to contribute whatever they want to the political process, and that includes corporations, which are run by — you guessed it — people who make a lot of money that, for all we know, they might make precisely so they can influence the political process.

What matters in politics is not who has the money. As long as we enforce transparency, we’ll know who’s running the commercials. Or is Dionne suggesting people are too stupid to judge politicians for themselves? Sure, AIG could run $2 million in ads against a candidate, but couldn’t that candidate get corporate money to defend himself — or attack AIG? Fellas like Dionne act as if the only people with money are evil Republicans who seek to rule politicians in Washington for their own financial gain. But the Supreme Court decision applies to unions and corporations of all stripes. (So, again — what’s the stop these big bad corporations from fighting those Dionne is worried about? The answer: nothing, really, now that the Supreme Court has rightly declared that political activism is barred from no one — rich or poor.)

But this whining is consistent with Dionne’s world view, which is that Americans are too dumb to think for themselves and incapable of judging truth from fiction. Me, I am confident that both sides stand to gain from this Supreme Court decision, making it basically a wash, and if I’m wrong, if people are too dumb and uninformed to sift through the noise of campaigns, then they’ll get the government they deserve. And if this nation goes down in flames as a result, then at least it was free (if only in this narrow aspect) for the duration of the ride to decide on a different course.

Advertisements
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: