Home > Debbie Stabenow, Health Care > “Public” and “option” are mere words; what’s dangerous is the subtext

“Public” and “option” are mere words; what’s dangerous is the subtext

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) is exactly right about what the potential Medicare/Medicaid deal’s replacement of the public option really means (as transcribed from today’s issue of POLITICO; sorry, I couldn’t find the link):

“For those of us who want a public option, we have to look at why did we want it — not the name. I didn’t support the public option because of its name. I supported a public option because of what it did. So, if we can accomplish it without calling it that, that works for me.”

Finally, some clarity. Finally, someone over there is admitting that the goal with the public option was never to “keep insurance companies honest” or to provide “true competition,” but was all along, instead, to funnel more people into a government-run system.

Advertisements
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: